BACKGROUND: Despite acute gout frequently complicating hospital admissions, diagnosis and management are variable. Rheumatology input may improve patient outcomes. AIM: To examine acute episodes of inpatient gout in a tertiary hospital to determine (i) factors that may lead to rheumatology input being sought and (ii) the differences in outcomes when rheumatology input occurs. METHODS: Data collection occurred between February and October 2012 for inpatients in a tertiary Australian hospital. Data were prospectively collected for all rheumatology consultations with a diagnosis of gout. Subjects who had an inpatient admission complicated by acute gout and who did not have rheumatology input were identified through health information coding from discharge summaries. RESULTS: Fifty-eight patients (41% with rheumatology input) were included in the study. Rheumatology input was significantly more likely when the patient was younger (68.9 years vs 78.4 years; P = 0.04) with knee joint involvement (41.7% vs 3.0%; P < 0.001). When rheumatology input occurred, subjects were more likely to have had a serum urate measured (83% vs 50%; P = 0.009), joint aspiration performed (54.2% vs 0%; P < 0.001), been prescribed acute gout medications at discharge (95.8% vs 61.3%; P = 0.001), a documented discharge plan (91.7% vs 23.5%; P < 0.001) and outpatient follow up (41.7% vs 0%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Among inpatients with acute gout, rheumatology input was more likely to be sought in younger patients with knee joint disease. When rheumatology input occurred, patients were more likely to have a synovial fluid confirmed diagnosis of gout with appropriate acute management and a follow-up plan.