Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation During AF Ablation on the Incidence of Left Atrial Flutter.

Michael W Lim; Matthew Morton; Romaniya Fernando; Stefanie Elbracht-Leong; Nathan Better; Louise Segan; Jeremy William; Rose Crowley; Joseph B Morton; Paul B Sparks; Geoffrey Lee; Alex J McLellan; Liang-Han Ling; Hariharan Sugumar; Sandeep Prabhu; Aleksandr Voskoboinik; Jonathan M Kalman; Peter M Kistler
Abstract
Linear and complex electrogram ablation (LCEA) beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increase in left atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardias (LAMTs). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly performed to improve AF ablation outcomes. However, the impact of PWI on the incidence of LAMT is unknown. The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence of LAMT following PVI alone vs PVI + PWI vs PVI + PWI + LCEA. Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF or LAMT post-AF ablation between 2008 and 2022 from 4 electrophysiology centers were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. In total, 5,619 (4,419 index, 1,100 redo) AF ablation procedures were performed in 4,783 patients (mean age 60.9 ± 10.6 years, 70.7% men). Over a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 3.8 years, 246 procedures for LAMT were performed in 214 patients at a mean of 2.6 ± 0.6 years post-AF ablation. Perimitral (52.8% of patients), roof-dependent (27.1%), PV gap-related (17.3%), and anterior circuits (8.9%) were most common, with 16.4% demonstrating multiple circuits. The incidence of LAMT was significantly higher following PVI + PWI (6.2%) vs PVI alone (3.0%; P < 0.0001) and following PVI + PWI + LCEA vs PVI + PWI (12.5%; P = 0.019). Conduction gaps in previous ablation lines were responsible for LAMT in 28.4% post-PVI alone, 35.3% post-PVI + PWI (P = 0.386), and 81.8% post-PVI + PWI + LCEA (P < 0.005). The incidence of LAMT following PVI + PWI is higher than with PVI alone but significantly lower than with more extensive atrial substrate modification. Given a low frequency of LAMT following PWI, empiric mitral isthmus ablation is not justified and may be proarrhythmic.
Journal JACC. CLINICAL ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY
ISSN 2405-5018
Published 09 May 2024
Volume
Issue
Pages
DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.008
Type Journal Article
Sponsorship